Friday, July 31, 2009
有些人类,
不用它智慧的结晶体,
去想一想才发表他的言论。
为什么,
有些人被人帮忙,
还会去怀疑有些人在陷害他,
为什么有些人爱人身攻击其他人?
可否有想过别人的感受?
而且,
自己的破绽百出,
也可以怪别人的,
这是哪门子的道理啊?
人身攻击,
使用最毒的东西与最尖锐的东西组成,
刺下去,
你能容忍五六次,
已经算是宽宏大量了。
有些人爱乘势追上,
在那里猛刺,
刺得人都觉得疼了,
忍不住反击了,
这还不止,
那些人还在另一头哭诉或埋怨,
那人好毒啊!!
但他们不知,
这些都是他们自己给的,
=中回自己的毒。
但另一边,
有人帮她解毒了,
还去怀疑下毒的人是帮她解毒的人,
并警告那帮他的人说:
你小心点,我可是会害回你的。
这是什么?
是好心没好报。
Why why oh tell me why
this happened again,
y dun she understanding me?
Y dun she think about the consequences?
y she is so buta on thinking?
Y she is so ... dun understand benefit is falling upon her?
Why she doesn't noe that i am much more difficult than her?
Why she is like that also acting strangely and thinking so suspicious?
Why?
WHy?
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Puzzle
is a type of drawing which is needed many part to build it up,
If u lost 1 of it,
maybe the image will be not fully-revealing in front of ur eye.
Puzzles,
can be said as the fragment,
those fragment maybe are ur fren, someone close to you or etc
this puzzle is so free,
u can divide it freely into how many pieces anytime,
it could be ur felling,
sometime missing a puzzle is so painful,
but some part of puzlle can be simply be replaced,
some cant,
as they are so important,
the puzzle maybe juz in front of ur eye,
but maybe something blocked it and make it hidden,
u have to move all those blockage in order to see the puzzle,
and find a suitable place in ur puzzle tray to put it.
And if u satisfied with the puzzle piece u make,
do not tear it easily,
something teared can be recovered,
but not as good as it before..
Hidden puzzle,
actually not really hidden,
maybe it is just hidden from ur vision or ur mind,
clear the unwanted waste to see it,
once u see it cherish it.
A completed puzzle,
maybe could be a bright light,
which leading u to a success place,
or be ur comforting partner,
but a puzzle is not easily to fill up,
A piece is so hard to find.
Maybe u juz put it,
but with another puzzle,
the one become unsuitable,
u have to replace it with anyone..
A puzzle,
invention of a genius,
is so deep its "xue wen"...
Dunno how much time i have to use to fill it up,
perhaps is forever,
but how much time u nid to fill up ur own puzzle?
Monday, July 27, 2009
Kind of Justice
In his dialogue Republic, Plato uses Socrates to argue for justice which covers both the just person and the just City State. Justice is a proper, harmonious relationship between the warring parts of the person or city. Hence Plato's definition of justice is that justice is the having and doing of what is one's own. A just man is a man in just the right place, doing his best and giving the precise equivalent of what he has received. This applies both at the individual level and at the universal level. A person’s soul has three parts – reason, spirit and desire. Similarly, a city has three parts – Socrates uses the parable of the chariot to illustrate his point: a chariot works as a whole because the two horses’ power is directed by the charioteer. Lovers of wisdom – philosophers, in one sense of the term – should rule because only they understand what is good. If one is ill, one goes to a doctor rather than a quack, because the doctor is expert in the subject of health. Similarly, one should trust one’s city to an expert in the subject of the good, not to a mere politician who tries to gain power by giving people what they want, rather than what’s good for them. Socrates uses the parable of the ship to illustrate this point: the unjust city is like a ship in open ocean, crewed by a powerful but drunken captain (the common people), a group of untrustworthy advisors who try to manipulate the captain into giving them power over the ship’s course (the politicians), and a navigator (the philosopher) who is the only one who knows how to get the ship to port. For Socrates, the only way the ship will reach its destination – the good – is if the navigator takes charge.
Justice as divine command
Justice as a divine law is commanding , and indeed the whole of morality, is the authoritative command. Killing is wrong and therefore must be punished and if not punished what should be done? There is a famous paradox called the Euthyphro dilemma which essentially asks: is something right because God commands it, or does God command it because it's right? If the former, then justice is arbitrary; if the latter, then morality exists on a higher order than God, who becomes little more than a passer-on of moral knowledge. Some Divine command advocates respond by pointing out that the dilemma is false: goodness is the very nature of God and is necessarily expressed in His commands.In contrast to the understandings canvassed so far, justice may be understood as a human creation, rather than a discovery of harmony, divine command, or natural law. This claim can be understood in a number of ways, with the fundamental division being between those who argue that justice is the creation of some humans, and those who argue that it is the creation of all humans.
Justice as authoritative command
According to thinkers including Thomas Hobbes, justice is created by public, enforceable, authoritative rules, and injustice is whatever those rules forbid, regardless of their relation to morality. Justice is created, not merely described or approximated, by the command of an absolute sovereign power. This position has some similarities with divine command theory (see above), with the difference that the state (or other authority) replaces God.
Justice as trickery
In Republic, the character Thrasymachus argues that justice is the interest of the strong—merely a name for what the powerful or cunning ruler has imposed on the people. Nietzsche, in contrast, argues that justice is part of the slave-morality of the weak many, rooted in their resentment of the strong few, and intended to keep the noble man down. In Human, All Too Human he states that, "there is no eternal justice."
Justice as mutual agreement
Justice as subordinate value
According to utilitarian thinkers including John Stuart Mill, justice is not as fundamental as we often think. Rather, it is derived from the more basic standard of rightness, consequentialism: what is right is what has the best consequences (usually measured by the total or average welfare caused). So, the proper principles of justice are those which tend to have the best consequences. These rules may turn out to be familiar ones such as keeping contracts; but equally, they may not, depending on the facts about real consequences. Either way, what is important is those consequences, and justice is important, if at all, only as derived from that fundamental standard. Mill tries to explain our mistaken belief that justice is overwhelmingly important by arguing that it derives from two natural human tendencies: our desire to retaliate against those who hurt us, and our ability to put ourselves imaginatively in another’s place. So, when we see someone harmed, we project ourselves into her situation and feel a desire to retaliate on her behalf. If this process is the source of our feelings about justice, that ought to undermine our confidence in them.
~ryan~
Extracted from wikipedia
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Akatsuki
这并不是真正的“晓”,
但我的学校有好多“枭”,
和“熊”
在我回忆的走廊里,
这个回忆对我来说是一种快乐,
安慰,
鼓励.
但追根究底,
究竟只是一个回忆.
一起做伴,
一起游玩,
一起分享。
在中学这种不现实但残酷的空间里,
能喘息到何时何刻?
我不知道。
只能怪,
我判断与选择能力差,
到了一个莫名其妙的地方,
头昏脑胀似的,
思考的空间全都被剥夺了。
莫名其妙的地方里,
有莫名其妙的人,
莫名其妙到,
有些骄傲,自大,炫耀。
也有人热心。
但相差的比例实在太大,
有时我真的在想,
我身在如此境界,
何时会受到影响?
朋友有些开始变得多疑,
是否受到这种莫名其妙的力量熏陶?
他们排除异己,
为的是得到权力,
他们不惜一切,
用尽三十六计,
为的是——
权利。
为何我不写“力”而写“利”?
因为这种形容比较传神,
权 kuasa (犬) anjing
利 kebaikan.
奋斗90日,
顶多再受苦两百二十日,
受苦的几率是38%?
还值得我去奋斗吗?
还是把机会让给东东好了,
这是一把危险的双刃剑,
控制不好时会犯些其身...
有时想,
这把剑交给不会使用的人,
会不会误伤我。
怎么说,
我的机会微乎其零。
漂浮在永无止境的海洋,
置身在空洞黑暗的地方......
但我深信,
拂晓将会慢慢走来..
结束的结束是开始...
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Sun, Moon and star
are very common things in this world,
their use are different,
Sun shines the world,
Moon give an comfortable atmosphere in the night,
And star decorates the sky..
I dun wan to be a moon but be a sun,
As moon is reflecting sun's light to let ppl see him.
Not that mean moon is not useful,
is useful,
but its use less than a sun.
A sun produces ray by its own,
dun need to hang on with other,
very independent,
And star,
will u like to be just a decorate in the stage of life?
If u are willing to do so,
i speechless.
Life's a stage,
the character is chosen by thou,
Which character u will choose?
Main character? Sub character?
Decorative?
Which u wan to be?
Sun?
Moon?
Star?
Thursday, July 9, 2009
Path
wait until the last moment then u decide?